Engineers Clinic
ExpertSoftware trackFP-AI-09

Tool-using agent that books field-service visits, with guardrails and an eval set

Build an LLM agent that checks availability, books, reschedules and cancels visits through real tool calls, refuses unsafe actions, and is measured on 120 scripted conversations.

AI, Data & AnalyticsAI Agents Development
6 Guided Steps55h Internship TierSubmit: GitHub repo with mock API, agent, guardrails and evaluation suite + eval/conversations.yaml (120 scripts) + results CSV + two-page safety caseVerified CertificateAI Rubric Graded
Program Overview

Industry project · for ClearFlow Home Services, a plumbing and heating company with 85 engineers across the Midlands and the US Midwest

ClearFlow books about 3,000 repair and service visits a month, split between its UK and US businesses. Customers phone or message, and a team of 9 coordinators checks the engineer calendar, finds a slot, confirms the address and books. Evenings and weekends are not covered, and about 18% of messages sent after 6pm never turn into a booking.

The operations director wants an assistant that can do the booking itself by calling the company's scheduling API, not just chat about it. She also listed what must never happen: - booking a slot that does not exist or is already taken; - cancelling or moving someone else's appointment; - promising a price, because prices depend on the engineer's diagnosis; - handling a gas-leak or carbon-monoxide report as a normal booking instead of giving the emergency number at once.

You will build a mock scheduling API (availability, book, reschedule, cancel, look up customer), seeded with 40 engineers, their skills and postcodes or ZIP codes, and two weeks of slots. You will then build an agent with an LLM that supports tool calling, plus guardrails in code (not only in the prompt) that check every action before it runs. Finally you will write an evaluation set of 120 scripted conversations, run each one with a simulated customer, and score task success, policy violations, number of turns and cost.

The go-live bar: at least 85% task success, zero critical policy violations across the 120 conversations, and every emergency handled correctly. Done looks like the API, the agent, the evaluation suite and its results, and a short safety case for the operations director.

LLM tool callingAgent designGuardrails in codeConversation simulationAgent evaluationAPI design
What you submit

GitHub repo with mock API, agent, guardrails and evaluation suite + eval/conversations.yaml (120 scripts) + results CSV + two-page safety case

Stack: Python, FastAPI, An LLM API with tool calling, SQLite, pytest

How it is graded
  • Agent completes tasks25

    Task success is at least 85% across 120 scripted conversations, judged against the database state after each run.

  • Guardrails hold30

    Zero critical violations, every emergency script gets the emergency response first, and each guardrail has a test that tries to break it.

  • Evaluation quality25

    Scripts cover happy paths, edge cases, adversarial users and emergencies, and results report success, violations, turns and cost per conversation.

  • Safety case20

    Two pages that set out each risk, the control for it and the evidence it works, ending with go-live conditions.

Pass 60% · Merit 75% · Distinction 90%

Learning Outcomes
Design tool schemas an LLM can use reliably
build an agent loop with state
enforce policy with code-level guardrails
simulate users to test agents at scale
measure success, violations, turns and cost
Target Audience

Engineering Students

Diploma, B.Tech, B.E., BCA, MCA, or M.Tech students seeking practical experience.

Aspiring Developers

Developers who want to build proof-of-work capstone projects for tech resumes.

Job Seekers

Graduates looking for AI-evaluated code review & verified industry credentials.