Engineers Clinic
IntermediateEngineering trackFP-ME-06

Design for assembly cost-down of a 750 W mixer grinder

Use DFMA methods to cut the part count and assembly time of a mixer grinder base, redesign one housing with snap fits, and show a 15% cost saving that pays back its tooling.

Core EngineeringCAD/CAM
6 Guided Steps38h Internship TierSubmit: Baseline BOM and DFA sheet + concept list + CAD model of the redesigned lower housing + cost and payback model + report for the plant headVerified CertificateAI Rubric Graded
Program Overview

Industry project · for Saffron Home Appliances, a Coimbatore maker of mixer grinders selling 1.2 lakh units a year in India and exporting to a UK retailer

Saffron's best-selling model is a 750 W mixer grinder with three jars. The base unit, everything except the jars, has 46 parts and takes 410 seconds to assemble on a line in Coimbatore. The bill of materials and labour come to ₹1,980 per unit.

A large UK retailer wants to stock it for South Asian households, but at a landed price that needs a 15% cost cut, about ₹300 per unit. Moving production abroad is not an option. The Coimbatore plant has to make it cheaper by designing it to be easier to build.

The current base has: - a two-piece ABS housing held together by 8 screws; - a separate motor mounting plate with 4 more screws; - a switch bracket, a knob, a knob insert and a spring; - 6 rubber feet, each pressed in by hand; - a cable clamp with 2 screws; - an overload-protector bracket, plus wiring, labels and the motor.

You will run a design for manufacture and assembly (DFMA) study. First you build a baseline with part count, assembly time and a design-efficiency index. Then you find the parts that could be merged or removed, redesign the lower housing in CAD with snap fits, integrated feet and a moulded motor seat, and cost the result including new mould tooling.

You do not need a factory. A teardown of any mixer grinder you can get, or the BOM in the task 1 starter, is enough. The CAD work is done in Fusion 360 student or FreeCAD.

Done looks like a baseline and a redesign analysis side by side, a CAD model of the new lower housing that can be moulded, a cost model in rupees with tooling payback, and a short report for the plant head. The targets are at least 25% fewer parts, at least 30% less assembly time, and ₹300 or more saved per unit.

Design for assembly analysisPart-count reductionSnap-fit designInjection-moulding design rulesShould-cost modellingTooling paybackProduct teardown
What you submit

Baseline BOM and DFA sheet + concept list + CAD model of the redesigned lower housing + cost and payback model + report for the plant head

Stack: Fusion 360 student or FreeCAD, Spreadsheet, Camera and basic tools for a teardown (optional), Draft analysis tool in CAD

How it is graded
  • Honest baseline20

    Every base-unit part is listed with handling and insertion times and a DFA index calculated by a stated method.

  • Real reductions25

    The redesign removes or merges parts using the minimum-part questions, reaching at least 25% fewer parts and 30% less assembly time.

  • Mouldable CAD25

    The new lower housing has draft, even wall thickness, workable snap fits and an integrated motor seat and feet.

  • Cost and payback20

    Part, labour and tooling costs are modelled in rupees and the per-unit saving and payback period are shown.

  • Report10

    A short report gives the plant head the saving, the risks and the safety checks still needed.

Pass 60% · Merit 75% · Distinction 90%

Learning Outcomes
Build a teardown BOM
score a product for assembly efficiency
find parts that can be merged or removed
design a mouldable part with snap fits and draft
cost a redesign with tooling payback
Target Audience

Engineering Students

Diploma, B.Tech, B.E., BCA, MCA, or M.Tech students seeking practical experience.

Aspiring Developers

Developers who want to build proof-of-work capstone projects for tech resumes.

Job Seekers

Graduates looking for AI-evaluated code review & verified industry credentials.